Q-learning at its simplest stores data in tables. This approach falters with increasing numbers of states/actions since the likelihood of the agent visiting a particular state and performing a particular action is increasingly small.
Reinforcement learning differs from supervised learning in not needing labelled input/output pairs to be presented, and in not needing sub-optimal actions to be explicitly corrected. Instead the focus is on finding a balance between exploration (of uncharted territory) and exploitation (of current knowledge) with the goal of maximizing the long term reward, whose feedback might be incomplete or delayed.[1]
The environment is typically stated in the form of a Markov decision process (MDP), because many reinforcement learning algorithms for this context use dynamic programming techniques.[2] The main difference between the classical dynamic programming methods and reinforcement learning algorithms is that the latter do not assume knowledge of an exact mathematical model of the Markov decision process and they target large Markov decision processes where exact methods become infeasible.[3]
Introduction
Due to its generality, reinforcement learning is studied in many disciplines, such as game theory, control theory, operations research, information theory, simulation-based optimization, multi-agent systems, swarm intelligence, and statistics. In the operations research and control literature, reinforcement learning is called approximate dynamic programming, or neuro-dynamic programming. The problems of interest in reinforcement learning have also been studied in the theory of optimal control, which is concerned mostly with the existence and characterization of optimal solutions, and algorithms for their exact computation, and less with learning or approximation, particularly in the absence of a mathematical model of the environment.
, the probability of transition (at time ) from state to state under action .
, the immediate reward after transition from to with action .
The purpose of reinforcement learning is for the agent to learn an optimal, or nearly-optimal, policy that maximizes the "reward function" or other user-provided reinforcement signal that accumulates from the immediate rewards. This is similar to processes that appear to occur in animal psychology. (See Reinforcement.) For example, biological brains are hardwired to interpret signals such as pain and hunger as negative reinforcements, and interpret pleasure and food intake as positive reinforcements. In some circumstances, animals can learn to engage in behaviors that optimize these rewards. This suggests that animals are capable of reinforcement learning.[4][5]
A basic reinforcement learning AI agent interacts with its environment in discrete time steps. At each time t, the agent receives the current state and reward . It then chooses an action from the set of available actions, which is subsequently sent to the environment. The environment moves to a new state and the reward associated with the transition is determined. The goal of a reinforcement learning agent is to learn a policy: , that maximizes the expected cumulative reward.
Formulating the problem as a Markov decision process assumes the agent directly observes the current environmental state; in this case the problem is said to have full observability. If the agent only has access to a subset of states, or if the observed states are corrupted by noise, the agent is said to have partial observability, and formally the problem must be formulated as a Partially observable Markov decision process. In both cases, the set of actions available to the agent can be restricted. For example, the state of an account balance could be restricted to be positive; if the current value of the state is 3 and the state transition attempts to reduce the value by 4, the transition will not be allowed.
When the agent's performance is compared to that of an agent that acts optimally, the difference in performance gives rise to the notion of regret. In order to act near optimally, the agent must reason about the long-term consequences of its actions (i.e., maximize future income), although the immediate reward associated with this might be negative.
Thus, reinforcement learning is particularly well-suited to problems that include a long-term versus short-term reward trade-off. It has been applied successfully to various problems, including energy storage operation,[6] robot control,[7] photovoltaic generators dispatch,[8]backgammon, checkers,[9]Go (AlphaGo), and autonomous driving systems.[10]
Two elements make reinforcement learning powerful: the use of samples to optimize performance and the use of function approximation to deal with large environments. Thanks to these two key components, reinforcement learning can be used in large environments in the following situations:
A model of the environment is known, but an analytic solution is not available;
The only way to collect information about the environment is to interact with it.
The first two of these problems could be considered planning problems (since some form of model is available), while the last one could be considered to be a genuine learning problem. However, reinforcement learning converts both planning problems to machine learning problems.
Exploration
The exploration vs. exploitation trade-off has been most thoroughly studied through the multi-armed bandit problem and for finite state space Markov decision processes in Burnetas and Katehakis (1997).[12]
Reinforcement learning requires clever exploration mechanisms; randomly selecting actions, without reference to an estimated probability distribution, shows poor performance. The case of (small) finite Markov decision processes is relatively well understood. However, due to the lack of algorithms that scale well with the number of states (or scale to problems with infinite state spaces), simple exploration methods are the most practical.
One such method is -greedy, where is a parameter controlling the amount of exploration vs. exploitation. With probability , exploitation is chosen, and the agent chooses the action that it believes has the best long-term effect (ties between actions are broken uniformly at random). Alternatively, with probability , exploration is chosen, and the action is chosen uniformly at random. is usually a fixed parameter but can be adjusted either according to a schedule (making the agent explore progressively less), or adaptively based on heuristics.[13]
Algorithms for control learning
Even if the issue of exploration is disregarded and even if the state was observable (assumed hereafter), the problem remains to use past experience to find out which actions lead to higher cumulative rewards.
Criterion of optimality
Policy
The agent's action selection is modeled as a map called policy:
The policy map gives the probability of taking action when in state .[14]: 61 There are also deterministic policies.
State-value function
The state-value function is defined as, expected discounted return starting with state , i.e. , and successively following policy . Hence, roughly speaking, the value function estimates "how good" it is to be in a given state.[14]: 60
where the random variable denotes the discounted return, and is defined as the sum of future discounted rewards:
where is the reward for transitioning from state to , is the discount rate. is less than 1, so rewards in the distant future are weighted less than rewards in the immediate future.
The algorithm must find a policy with maximum expected discounted return. From the theory of Markov decision processes it is known that, without loss of generality, the search can be restricted to the set of so-called stationary policies. A policy is stationary if the action-distribution returned by it depends only on the last state visited (from the observation agent's history). The search can be further restricted to deterministic stationary policies. A deterministic stationary policy deterministically selects actions based on the current state. Since any such policy can be identified with a mapping from the set of states to the set of actions, these policies can be identified with such mappings with no loss of generality.
For each possible policy, sample returns while following it
Choose the policy with the largest expected discounted return
One problem with this is that the number of policies can be large, or even infinite. Another is that the variance of the returns may be large, which requires many samples to accurately estimate the discounted return of each policy.
These problems can be ameliorated if we assume some structure and allow samples generated from one policy to influence the estimates made for others. The two main approaches for achieving this are value function estimation and direct policy search.
Value function approaches attempt to find a policy that maximizes the discounted return by maintaining a set of estimates of expected discounted returns for some policy (usually either the "current" [on-policy] or the optimal [off-policy] one).
These methods rely on the theory of Markov decision processes, where optimality is defined in a sense stronger than the one above: A policy is optimal if it achieves the best-expected discounted return from any initial state (i.e., initial distributions play no role in this definition). Again, an optimal policy can always be found among stationary policies.
To define optimality in a formal manner, define the state-value of a policy by
where stands for the discounted return associated with following from the initial state . Defining as the maximum possible state-value of , where is allowed to change,
A policy that achieves these optimal state-values in each state is called optimal. Clearly, a policy that is optimal in this sense is also optimal in the sense that it maximizes the expected discounted return, since , where is a state randomly sampled from the distribution of initial states (so ).
Although state-values suffice to define optimality, it is useful to define action-values. Given a state , an action and a policy , the action-value of the pair under is defined by
where now stands for the random discounted return associated with first taking action in state and following , thereafter.
The theory of Markov decision processes states that if is an optimal policy, we act optimally (take the optimal action) by choosing the action from with the highest action-value at each state, . The action-value function of such an optimal policy () is called the optimal action-value function and is commonly denoted by . In summary, the knowledge of the optimal action-value function alone suffices to know how to act optimally.
Assuming full knowledge of the Markov decision process, the two basic approaches to compute the optimal action-value function are value iteration and policy iteration. Both algorithms compute a sequence of functions () that converge to . Computing these functions involves computing expectations over the whole state-space, which is impractical for all but the smallest (finite) Markov decision processes. In reinforcement learning methods, expectations are approximated by averaging over samples and using function approximation techniques to cope with the need to represent value functions over large state-action spaces.
Monte Carlo methods
Monte Carlo methods[15] are used to solve reinforcement learning problems by averaging sample returns. Unlike methods that require full knowledge of the environment’s dynamics, Monte Carlo methods rely solely on actual or simulated experience—sequences of states, actions, and rewards obtained from interaction with an environment. This makes them applicable in situations where the complete dynamics are unknown. Learning from actual experience does not require prior knowledge of the environment and can still lead to optimal behavior. When using simulated experience, only a model capable of generating sample transitions is required, rather than a full specification of transition probabilities, which is necessary for dynamic programming methods.
Monte Carlo methods apply to episodic tasks, where experience is divided into episodes that eventually terminate. Policy and value function updates occur only after the completion of an episode, making these methods incremental on an episode-by-episode basis, though not on a step-by-step (online) basis. The term “Monte Carlo” generally refers to any method involving random sampling; however, in this context, it specifically refers to methods that compute averages from complete returns, rather than partial returns.
These methods function similarly to the bandit algorithms, in which returns are averaged for each state-action pair. The key difference is that actions taken in one state affect the returns of subsequent states within the same episode, making the problem non-stationary. To address this non-stationarity, Monte Carlo methods use the framework of general policy iteration (GPI). While dynamic programming computes value functions using full knowledge of the Markov decision process (MDP), Monte Carlo methods learn these functions through sample returns. The value functions and policies interact similarly to dynamic programming to achieve optimality, first addressing the prediction problem and then extending to policy improvement and control, all based on sampled experience.[14]
The first problem is corrected by allowing the procedure to change the policy (at some or all states) before the values settle. This too may be problematic as it might prevent convergence. Most current algorithms do this, giving rise to the class of generalized policy iteration algorithms. Many actor-critic methods belong to this category.
The second issue can be corrected by allowing trajectories to contribute to any state-action pair in them. This may also help to some extent with the third problem, although a better solution when returns have high variance is Sutton's temporal difference (TD) methods that are based on the recursive Bellman equation.[16][17] The computation in TD methods can be incremental (when after each transition the memory is changed and the transition is thrown away), or batch (when the transitions are batched and the estimates are computed once based on the batch). Batch methods, such as the least-squares temporal difference method,[18] may use the information in the samples better, while incremental methods are the only choice when batch methods are infeasible due to their high computational or memory complexity. Some methods try to combine the two approaches. Methods based on temporal differences also overcome the fourth issue.
Another problem specific to TD comes from their reliance on the recursive Bellman equation. Most TD methods have a so-called parameter that can continuously interpolate between Monte Carlo methods that do not rely on the Bellman equations and the basic TD methods that rely entirely on the Bellman equations. This can be effective in palliating this issue.
Function approximation methods
In order to address the fifth issue, function approximation methods are used. Linear function approximation starts with a mapping that assigns a finite-dimensional vector to each state-action pair. Then, the action values of a state-action pair are obtained by linearly combining the components of with some weights:
The algorithms then adjust the weights, instead of adjusting the values associated with the individual state-action pairs. Methods based on ideas from nonparametric statistics (which can be seen to construct their own features) have been explored.
Value iteration can also be used as a starting point, giving rise to the Q-learning algorithm and its many variants.[19] Including Deep Q-learning methods when a neural network is used to represent Q, with various applications in stochastic search problems.[20]
The problem with using action-values is that they may need highly precise estimates of the competing action values that can be hard to obtain when the returns are noisy, though this problem is mitigated to some extent by temporal difference methods. Using the so-called compatible function approximation method compromises generality and efficiency.
Direct policy search
An alternative method is to search directly in (some subset of) the policy space, in which case the problem becomes a case of stochastic optimization. The two approaches available are gradient-based and gradient-free methods.
Gradient-based methods (policy gradient methods) start with a mapping from a finite-dimensional (parameter) space to the space of policies: given the parameter vector , let denote the policy associated to . Defining the performance function by under mild conditions this function will be differentiable as a function of the parameter vector . If the gradient of was known, one could use gradient ascent. Since an analytic expression for the gradient is not available, only a noisy estimate is available. Such an estimate can be constructed in many ways, giving rise to algorithms such as Williams' REINFORCE method[21] (which is known as the likelihood ratio method in the simulation-based optimization literature).[22]
Policy search methods may converge slowly given noisy data. For example, this happens in episodic problems when the trajectories are long and the variance of the returns is large. Value-function based methods that rely on temporal differences might help in this case. In recent years, actor–critic methods have been proposed and performed well on various problems.[23]
Policy search methods have been used in the robotics context.[24] Many policy search methods may get stuck in local optima (as they are based on local search).
Model-based algorithms
Finally, all of the above methods can be combined with algorithms that first learn a model of the Markov Decision Process, the probability of each next state given an action taken from an existing state. For instance, the Dyna algorithm[25] learns a model from experience, and uses that to provide more modelled transitions for a value function, in addition to the real transitions. Such methods can sometimes be extended to use of non-parametric models, such as when the transitions are simply stored and 'replayed'[26] to the learning algorithm.
Model-based methods can be more computationally intensive than model-free approaches, and their utility can be limited by the extent to which the Markov Decision Process can be learnt.[27]
There are other ways to use models than to update a value function.[28] For instance, in model predictive control the model is used to update the behavior directly.
Theory
Both the asymptotic and finite-sample behaviors of most algorithms are well understood. Algorithms with provably good online performance (addressing the exploration issue) are known.
Efficient exploration of Markov decision processes is given in Burnetas and Katehakis (1997).[12] Finite-time performance bounds have also appeared for many algorithms, but these bounds are expected to be rather loose and thus more work is needed to better understand the relative advantages and limitations.
For incremental algorithms, asymptotic convergence issues have been settled[clarification needed]. Temporal-difference-based algorithms converge under a wider set of conditions than was previously possible (for example, when used with arbitrary, smooth function approximation).
Associative reinforcement learning tasks combine facets of stochastic learning automata tasks and supervised learning pattern classification tasks. In associative reinforcement learning tasks, the learning system interacts in a closed loop with its environment.[46]
Adversarial deep reinforcement learning is an active area of research in reinforcement learning focusing on vulnerabilities of learned policies. In this research area some studies initially showed that reinforcement learning policies are susceptible to imperceptible adversarial manipulations.[49][50][51] While some methods have been proposed to overcome these susceptibilities, in the most recent studies it has been shown that these proposed solutions are far from providing an accurate representation of current vulnerabilities of deep reinforcement learning policies.[52]
Fuzzy reinforcement learning
By introducing fuzzy inference in reinforcement learning,[53] approximating the state-action value function with fuzzy rules in continuous space becomes possible. The IF - THEN form of fuzzy rules make this approach suitable for expressing the results in a form close to natural language. Extending FRL with Fuzzy Rule Interpolation [54] allows the use of reduced size sparse fuzzy rule-bases to emphasize cardinal rules (most important state-action values).
Inverse reinforcement learning
In inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), no reward function is given. Instead, the reward function is inferred given an observed behavior from an expert. The idea is to mimic observed behavior, which is often optimal or close to optimal.[55] One popular IRL paradigm is named maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning (MaxEnt IRL). [56] MaxEnt IRL estimates the parameters of a linear model of the reward function by maximizing the entropy of the probability distribution of observed trajectories subject to constraints related to matching expected feature counts. Recently it has been shown that MaxEnt IRL is a particular case of a more general framework named random utility inverse reinforcement learning (RU-IRL). [57] RU-IRL is based on random utility theory and Markov decision processes. While prior IRL approaches assume that the apparent random behavior of an observed agent is due to it following a random policy, RU-IRL assumes that the observed agent follows a deterministic policy but randomness in observed behavior is due to the fact that an observer only has partial access to the features the observed agent uses in decision making. The utility function is modeled as a random variable to account for the ignorance of the observer regarding the features the observed agent actually considers in its utility function.
Safe reinforcement learning
Safe reinforcement learning (SRL) can be defined as the process of learning policies that maximize the expectation of the return in problems in which it is important to ensure reasonable system performance and/or respect safety constraints during the learning and/or deployment processes.[58] An alternative approach is risk-averse reinforcement learning, where instead of the expected return, a risk-measure of the return is optimized, such as the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR).[59] In addition to mitigating risk, the CVaR objective increases robustness to model uncertainties.[60][61] However, CVaR optimization in risk-averse RL requires special care, to prevent gradient bias[62] and blindness to success.[63]
Statistical comparison of reinforcement learning algorithms
Efficient comparison of RL algorithms is essential for research, deployment and monitoring of RL systems. To compare different algorithms on a given environment, an agent can be trained for each algorithm. Since the performance is sensitive to implementation details, all algorithms should be implemented as closely as possible to each other.[64] After the training is finished, the agents can be run on a sample of test episodes, and their scores (returns) can be compared. Since episodes are typically assumed to be i.i.d, standard statistical tools can be used for hypothesis testing, such as T-test and permutation test.[65] This requires to accumulate all the rewards within an episode into a single number - the episodic return. However, this causes a loss of information, as different time-steps are averaged together, possibly with different levels of noise. Whenever the noise level varies across the episode, the statistical power can be improved significantly, by weighting the rewards according to their estimated noise.[66]
^van Otterlo, M.; Wiering, M. (2012). "Reinforcement Learning and Markov Decision Processes". Reinforcement Learning. Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization. Vol. 12. pp. 3–42. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27645-3_1. ISBN978-3-642-27644-6.
^Russell, Stuart J.; Norvig, Peter (2010). Artificial intelligence : a modern approach (Third ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. pp. 830, 831. ISBN978-0-13-604259-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^Xie, Zhaoming; Hung Yu Ling; Nam Hee Kim; Michiel van de Panne (2020). "ALLSTEPS: Curriculum-driven Learning of Stepping Stone Skills". arXiv:2005.04323 [cs.GR].
^Williams, Ronald J. (1987). "A class of gradient-estimating algorithms for reinforcement learning in neural networks". Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Neural Networks. CiteSeerX10.1.1.129.8871.
^Sutton, Richard (1990). "Integrated Architectures for Learning, Planning and Reacting based on Dynamic Programming". Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop.
^Riveret, Regis; Gao, Yang (2019). "A probabilistic argumentation framework for reinforcement learning agents". Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 33 (1–2): 216–274. doi:10.1007/s10458-019-09404-2. S2CID71147890.
^Yamagata, Taku; McConville, Ryan; Santos-Rodriguez, Raul (2021-11-16). "Reinforcement Learning with Feedback from Multiple Humans with Diverse Skills". arXiv:2111.08596 [cs.LG].
^Dabérius, Kevin; Granat, Elvin; Karlsson, Patrik (2020). "Deep Execution - Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learning for Trading and Beating Market Benchmarks". The Journal of Machine Learning in Finance. 1. SSRN3374766.
^Duan, J; Wang, W; Xiao, L (2023-10-26). "DSAC-T: Distributional Soft Actor-Critic with Three Refinements". arXiv:2310.05858 [cs.LG].
^Soucek, Branko (6 May 1992). Dynamic, Genetic and Chaotic Programming: The Sixth-Generation Computer Technology Series. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 38. ISBN0-471-55717-X.
^Goodfellow, Ian; Shlens, Jonathan; Szegedy, Christian (2015). "Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples". International Conference on Learning Representations. arXiv:1412.6572.
^Behzadan, Vahid; Munir, Arslan (2017). "Vulnerability of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Policy Induction Attacks". Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 10358. pp. 262–275. arXiv:1701.04143. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62416-7_19. ISBN978-3-319-62415-0. S2CID1562290.
I3 i3 dengan Vim dan TerminalTipemanajer jendela menyusun dan perangkat lunak bebas Versi pertama16 Maret 2009; 14 tahun lalu (2009-03-16)[1]Versi stabil 4.23 (29 Oktober 2023) LisensiLisensi BSD[2]Karakteristik teknisSistem operasiGNU/Linux, BSD (en), macOS dan mirip Unix Ukuran1.3 MiB[3]Bahasa pemrogramanC Informasi pengembangPembuatMichael StapelbergSumber kode Kode sumberPranala Debiani3-wm Arch Linuxi3-wm Ubuntui3-wm Gentoox11-wm/i3 Fedorai3 Informasi tambahanSi…
Gereja Maria Bunda Pertolongan Abadi, BinjaiLokasiPastoran Katolik, Jl. Sukarno Hatta 178, Binjai 20731 BinjaiDidirikan1 Januari 1980[1]AdministrasiKeuskupanAgung MedanImam yang bertugaspastor ProjoParokialStasi27[1]Catatan Pendirian: Sebelumnya di Paroki Katedral Medan[1] Paroki Bunda Pertolongan Abadi, Binjai adalah paroki di bawah Keuskupan Agung Medan terletak di Binjai, Sumatera Utara Sejarah Bagian ini memerlukan pengembangan. Anda dapat membantu dengan mengembangka…
Kuil Maya Devi di Lumbini, Nepal adalah tempat lahir Buddha. Kompleks Kuil Mahabodhi di Bodh Gaya, India. Biara Buddha kuno dekat Situs Monumen Stupa Dhamek di Sarnath, India dimana Buddha menyebarkan pengajaran pertamanya. Kuil Parinirvana dengan Stupa Parinirvana di Kushinagar, India dimana Buddha mengalami Parinirvana setelah kematiannya Ini adalah daftar kuil, biara, stupa, dan pagoda Buddha yang ada di Wikipedia, dibagi menurut lokasi. Australia Teritorial Ibu kota Australia Biara Buddha Ma…
Xiangyang (dulunya Xiangfan, Hanzi: 襄樊市) merupakan kota yang terletak di sebelah barat laut Provinsi Hubei, RRT. Kota ini terletak di antara sungai Panjang dan sungai Han. Sejarah Kota ini sebenarnya merupakan gabungan dari 2 kota yang berseberangan di tepi Sungai Han, Xiangyang di tepi selatan dan Fancheng di tepi utara. Kedua kota ini merupakan pusat ekonomi dan militer penting pada zaman kuno. Setelah tahun 1949, pemerintah Beijing baru menyatukan kedua kota menjadi kota Xiangfan. Admin…
United States Army officer (1827–1863) George Lamb WillardCol. George L. WillardBorn(1827-08-15)August 15, 1827New York City, USDiedJuly 2, 1863(1863-07-02) (aged 35)Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, USAllegianceUnited StatesUnionService/branchUnited States ArmyUnion ArmyYears of service1847–1863RankColonelUnit15th U.S. Infantry8th U.S. Infantry19th U. S. InfantryCommands held125th New York Infantry3rd Bde, 3rd Div, II CorpsBattles/warsMexican-American War Battle of Chapultepec American Ci…
American record label (1946–1947) For the British and French record labels, see Disques Vogue. This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The first and most popular release from Vogue in the U.S. Vogue Records was a short-lived United States-based record la…
1918 film Miss InnocenceTheatrical posterDirected byHarry MillardeWritten byThomas F. FallonBased ona story by Harry CorkerProduced byWilliam FoxStarringJune CapriceCinematographyNat LeachDistributed byFox Film CorporationRelease date July 21, 1918 (1918-07-21) Running time5 reelsCountryUnited StatesLanguageSilent (English intertitles) Miss Innocence is a 1918 American silent drama film directed by Harry Millarde and starring June Caprice. It was produced and released by the Fox F…
American businessman and founder of the NFL's Washington Redskins (1896–1969) For other people named George Marshall, see George Marshall (disambiguation). American football player George Preston MarshallMarshall in 1949Personal informationBorn:(1896-10-11)October 11, 1896Grafton, West Virginia, U.S.Died:August 9, 1969(1969-08-09) (aged 72)Washington, D.C., U.S.Career informationCollege:Randolph-Macon CollegePosition:OwnerCareer history As an executive: Boston Braves / Redskins / Washingt…
Piala Generalísimo 1958Negara SpanyolJumlah peserta16Juara bertahanBarcelonaJuaraAtlético Bilbao(gelar ke-20)Tempat keduaReal MadridJumlah pertandingan30Jumlah gol94 (3.13 per pertandingan)Pencetak gol terbanyak Alfredo Di Stéfano(Real Madrid C.F.) Antón Arieta(Atlético de Bilbao)(7 gol)← 1957 1958–1959 → Piala Generalísimo 1958 adalah edisi ke-54 dari penyelenggaraan Piala Raja Spanyol, turnamen sepak bola di Spanyol dengan sistem piala. Edisi ini dimenangkan oleh Atlético Bil…
Brazilian fantasy television series This article is about the Brazilian streaming television series. For other uses, see Invisible City (disambiguation). Invisible CityPortugueseCidade Invisível GenreFantasyCreated byCarlos SaldanhaBased onan original ideaby Raphael DracconCarolina MunhózWritten byMirna NogueiraDirected by Luis Carone Júlia Pacheco Jordão Starring Marco Pigossi Alessandra Negrini Fábio Lago Jessica Córes Jimmy London Wesley Guimarães Áurea Maranhão Julia Konrad Thaia Pe…
Mechanical process Laboratory centrifuge Centrifugation is a mechanical process which involves the use of the centrifugal force to separate particles from a solution according to their size, shape, density, medium viscosity and rotor speed.[1] The denser components of the mixture migrate away from the axis of the centrifuge, while the less dense components of the mixture migrate towards the axis. Chemists and biologists may increase the effective gravitational force of the test tube so t…
Gambar dekat perbatasan dengan lempeng Eurasia, Arab dan India. Dataran Tinggi Iran atau Dataran Tinggi Persia,[1][2] adalah sebuah formasi geologis di Asia Barat dan Asia Tengah. Dataran tinggi ini merupakan bagian dari Lempeng Eurasia yang terjepit di antara lempeng Arab dan India, terletak di antara Pegunungan Zagros di sebelah barat, Laut Kaspia dan Kopet Dag di sebelah utara, Dataran Tinggi Armenia dan Pegunungan Kaukasus di sebelah barat laut, Selat Hormuz dan Teluk Persia …
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada April 2017. Naoki NakagawaInformasi pribadiNama lengkap Naoki NakagawaTanggal lahir 13 Juni 1984 (umur 39)Tempat lahir Tokyo, JepangPosisi bermain BekKarier senior*Tahun Tim Tampil (Gol)2003-2004 Urawa Reds * Penampilan dan gol di klub senior hanya dihitung dari l…
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Tencteri – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) The approximate positions of some Germanic peoples reported by Graeco-Roman authors in the 1st century. The Tencteri or Tenchteri or Tenctheri (in Plutarc…
Voce principale: Leonard Bernstein. Leonard Bernstein, ca. 1950s. Questa è una lista di composizioni del compositore americano Leonard Bernstein. Indice 1 Balletto 2 Opera 3 Musical 4 Musiche di scena ed altro teatro 5 Musica da film 6 Orchestra 7 Coro 8 Musica da camera 9 Musica vocale 10 Musica per pianoforte 11 Altra musica 12 Note 13 Bibliografia Balletto Fancy Free (in seguito ha fornito materiale per On the Town e West Side Story) (1944) Facsimile, Saggio coreografico per orchestra (1946)…
Questa voce sull'argomento stagioni delle società calcistiche italiane è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Voce principale: Società Sportiva Casalecchio 1921. Polisportiva CasalecchioStagione 1933-1934Sport calcio Squadra Casalecchio Prima Divisione14º posto nel girone D, retrocessa in Seconda Divisione 1934-35. 1932-1933 1934-1935 Si invita a seguire il modello di voce Questa pagina ra…
Portrait de Hova par Eugène Trutat (1896) Orchestre mpilalao(Exposition coloniale de 1931) Dans sa signification la plus courante à Madagascar même, le terme hova désigne la plus importante subdivision du peuple des Merina, correspondant aux gens du commun. Différentes significations Dans le sens le plus fréquent, le terme hova pouvait être opposé à andriana d'une part et à mainty enindreny de l'autre. Dans bien des cas cependant, il ne correspondait pas forcément à « roturier&…