Template talk:G-Unit Records

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merge-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z-Merge","c-Debresser-2009-09-24T23:24:00.000Z-Merge"],"text":"Merge","linkableTitle":"Merge"}-->

Merge

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merge-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z-Merge","c-Debresser-2009-09-24T23:24:00.000Z-Merge"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merge-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z-Merge","c-Debresser-2009-09-24T23:24:00.000Z-Merge"],"text":"Merge","linkableTitle":"Merge"}-->
  • Merge I don't know, basically it's mostly similar to the G-Unit template and I just don't get the need for a seperate template for the G-Unit family when we can basically merge them together in a clever way. I'm sorry but I just don't see this template as necessary, it's redundant. --Taylor Karras (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z","author":"Taylor Karras","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Taylor_Karras-2009-08-05T08:02:00.000Z-Merge","replies":[]}}-->
  • Agree with merge proposal. Debresser (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-24T23:24:00.000Z","author":"Debresser","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Debresser-2009-09-24T23:24:00.000Z-Merge","replies":[]}}-->
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya