Template talk:US-mil-ship-stub


How about United States Army vessels? Anyone have any objections to adding them as part of the stub? — Bellhalla (talk) 14:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-12-12T14:47:00.000Z","author":"Bellhalla","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bellhalla-2007-12-12T14:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bahamut0013-2009-04-06T16:24:00.000Z-Bellhalla-2007-12-12T14:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

I agree. The Air Force has ships as well... I think the wording "This article about a specific United States military ship or boat is a stub." would work best to cover all of our bases. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-06T16:24:00.000Z","author":"Bahamut0013","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Bahamut0013-2009-04-06T16:24:00.000Z-Bellhalla-2007-12-12T14:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bahamut0013-2009-09-29T12:28:00.000Z-Bahamut0013-2009-04-06T16:24:00.000Z"]}}-->
I have made the change. An alternative could also be "This article about a specific ship or boat of the United States military (Navy, Coast Guard, Army, or Air Force) is a stub." Though stub templates aren't supposed to be navigational aides like that! :P bahamut0013wordsdeeds 12:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-29T12:28:00.000Z","author":"Bahamut0013","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Bahamut0013-2009-09-29T12:28:00.000Z-Bahamut0013-2009-04-06T16:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya