Template talk:Brahmic

Source

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Source","replies":[]}}-->
  • Steven Roger Fischer, History of Writing Systems, table on p. 107. Google books link. This turned out to contain lots of errors
  • Masica, The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp. 143ff. Google books link
  • Please add more information, corrections, as long as you have the sources.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template_too_large-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z-Template_too_large"],"text":"Template too large","linkableTitle":"Template too large"}-->

Template too large

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template_too_large-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z-Template_too_large"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template_too_large-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z-Template_too_large"],"text":"Template too large","linkableTitle":"Template too large"}-->

IMO this template is too large. Perhaps it makes more sense to add the family tree to Brahmic family, and replace this with a smaller, horizontal navigational box (or perhaps just leave it at the 'writing systems' navigational box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joost (talkcontribs) 12:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z","author":"Joost","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Joost-2008-03-06T12:35:00.000Z-Template_too_large","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_correct_the_tree-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z-Please_correct_the_tree"],"text":"Please correct the tree","linkableTitle":"Please correct the tree"}-->

Please correct the tree

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_correct_the_tree-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z-Please_correct_the_tree"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_correct_the_tree-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z-Please_correct_the_tree"],"text":"Please correct the tree","linkableTitle":"Please correct the tree"}-->

Oriya language or script is a descendant of Brahmi script but not a descendant of Proto-Bengali script, please see the following categorization which says that Kalinga script is the precursor of modern Oriya script. [1] ସୁଭ ପା/Subhashish Panigrahi 16:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubhashish (talkcontribs)

As far as I know, Oriya is a northern script, not a southern one. Oriya has a much closer relationship with Bengali and Devanagari, rather than Telugu or any other southern script. The Wikipedia article says the same. This mistake should be corrected. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriya_alphabet#Comparison_of_O.E1.B9.9Biy.C4.81_script_with_its_neighbours 117.197.78.255 (talk) 07:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z","author":"117.197.78.255","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-117.197.78.255-2012-05-27T07:47:00.000Z-Please_correct_the_tree","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Unicode_11-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z-Unicode_11"],"text":"Unicode 11","linkableTitle":"Unicode 11"}-->

Unicode 11

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Unicode_11-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z-Unicode_11"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Unicode_11-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z-Unicode_11"],"text":"Unicode 11","linkableTitle":"Unicode 11"}-->

Three new Brahmic scripts were added with Unicode 11.0:

They should probably be added to this template but I'm not completely sure where in the tree they go. Does anyone know? Thanks. DRMcCreedy (talk) 04:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z","author":"Drmccreedy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drmccreedy-2018-06-10T04:08:00.000Z-Unicode_11","replies":[]}}-->