Nathan A. Scott Jr.

Nathan A. Scott Jr. (24 April 1925 – December 2006) was an American scholar who helped establish the modern field of theology and literature and who helped found the well-known Ph.D. program in that field at the University of Chicago.^[1] Scott also published seventeen books, in addition to publishing articles and reviews and editing editions.^[2] He has likewise been the subject of numerous articles and books.

Scott's innovation in literary criticism was to reject the New Critics' idea that poems should be studied as autonomous objects and to remind scholars that authors' personal beliefs are crucial for understanding their texts; in this way, he also returned criticism to a study of the way literature represents the outside world.^[3]

Scott earned his B.A. at the University of Michigan in 1944, his B.D. at Union Theological Seminary in 1946, and his Ph.D. at Columbia University in 1949, having studied under Lionel Trilling, Reinhold Niebuhr, and Jacques Barzun.^[2] He served as dean of the chapel at Virginia Union University and was an ordained priest in the Episcopal Church. He taught at Howard University in Washington, D.C.^[4] He taught at Chicago from 1955 to 1977, when he moved to University of Virginia. He also served as a President of the American Academy of Religion.^[2]

References

^ Wright, Terry. "Religion and Literature from the Modern to the Postmodern: Scott, Steiner and Detweiler". Literature and Theology 19.1 (2005) 3-21.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Remembering Nathan Scott" by Henry L. Carrigan, Jr.
^ Hesla, David H. "Religion and Literature: The Second Stage." Journal of the American Academy of Religion 46.2 (1978): 181-192. Accessed through JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1462220 18 October 2009.
^ Fikes, Robert. Nathan A. Scott (1925-2006). Callaloo 30.1 (2007): 10-12.

Partial bibliography

Rehearsals of Discomposure. Alienation and Reconciliation in Modern Literature. New York: King's Crown Press of Columbia University Press. 1952.
The Broken Center. Studies in the Theological Horizon of Modern Literature. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. 1966.
Negative Capability. Studies in the New Literature and the Religious Situation. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. 1969. ISBN 9780300011067.
The Poetics of Belief: Studies in Coleridge, Arnold, Pater, Santayana, Stevens, and Heidegger. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1985.
The Climate of Faith in Modern Literature. New York: The Seabury Press. 1964. (editor)

External links

Religion and Literature at U Chicago's Divinity School
Gerhart, Mary and Anthony C. Yu, eds. Morphologies of Faith: Essays in Religion and Culture in Honor of Nathan A. Scott Jr. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.
"Remembering Nathan Scott" by Henry L. Carrigan Jr.

Along with Stanley Romaine Hopper at Drew University, Preston Roberts and Nathan A. Scott Jr. at the University of Chicago established the emerging interdisciplinary field that became known variously as religion and literature, theology and literature, or Christianity and literature. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, theologians found themselves looking to the literature of the post-World War II period for articulate expressions of theological themes such as despair, alienation, redemption, and revelation. Drawing primarily on Paul Tillich's theology of culture—which defined religion as the substance of culture and culture as the form of religion—Scott eloquently explored the crisis of faith in modern literature, the climate of faith in Kafka, Camus, and Bellow, and the themes of alienation and reconciliation in modern plays, poetry, and novels. Scott taught several generations of students that a dialogue with the literary imagination of the age would provide rich rewards for Christian theology by offering a deepening awareness of itself and the time in which it finds itself. In one of his most eloquent and astute observations, Scott pointed out that the sense that the anchoring center of life is broken and that the world is abandoned and adrift is a basic premise underlying most of our literature.